Showing posts with label blog. Show all posts
Showing posts with label blog. Show all posts

Saturday, March 21, 2009

Update, Electricity, and Biochar

Its True.  I'll be putting my soil science blogging energy elsewhere for the forseeable future: http://nscss.org/blog/207.  Admittedly, not a pretty name, not like Transect Points: views from the underground.  Might have to make an url alias.


My latest post is on Soil Electricity, I am such a sucker for soil redox insights. 

A previous post, BioChar: Standards, Methods, and Opportunities, is a followup on NSCSS' Biochar panel discussion earlier this month.  Plus it is a lead-in to a  guidebook I am establishing for consulting soil scientists on biochar.

 

Sunday, June 08, 2008

Dynamic Earth blogs on Soil Science

Eric, over at Dynamic Earth is blogging on about soil science.

Soils are a lot like pornography: you know em when you see em, but everyone has a hard time agreeing on a definition.

True that. Eric's posts are a pretty quick study (its a blog after all) of a complex subject, and he does an admirable job of organizing the popular understanding of soil. I shouldn't expect, but I always look for, even the briefest nod to including energy as fascinatingly important to the understanding of soil, at least as equally fascinating as the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics.

Soil classification is only a beginning in pursuing a deeper understanding of the more dynamic characteristics of the soil resource. Nikiforoff's 1959 definition of soil as the "excited skin of the sub aerial part of the earth's crust". (ref) speaks to that energy. We all recognize that soil involves energy but we have been slow to engage in an understanding of that energy as a component of the dynamic earth.

Most of what has been studied regarding energy in soil is in relation to remediation of contaminants, preventing corrosion, waste treatment, and wetland chemistry: small but practical subsets of the knowledge we need. And we do use energy states and gradients to characterize soil (redox, pE), so it is not like energy is ignored. It is just that the labels we present it under do not communicate energy. Wetland chemistry, bioremediation, phytoremediation, geobiochemistry, soil ecology: these are not terms that alerts one to the fact that energy is the fundamental driver. That our soil projects are nonetheless successful points to the simplicity of the soil problems we have been addressing up until now. As we are challenged to better understand the energy dynamics of the earth, this is certain to change.

ref: C. C. Nikiforoff. 1959. "Reappraisal of the soil: Pedogenesis consists of transactions in matter and energy between the soil and its surroundings". Science 129: 186-196.

Sunday, February 25, 2007

Don't Dig Too Deep

Historically, there have been between 100 and 300 people killed in the United States every year due to trench collapses. Jordan Barab covers these trench hazards in his worker safety blog, Confined Space.

On Friday, a worker in Georgia was trapped for two hours, briefly up to his neck, when the trench he was working in collapsed. Last word was that he survived, but the extent of his internal injuries had not been assessed. He is in my prayers.

It is a strong man, and lucky to boot, able to breathe under the crushing dead weight of soil. When soil drops, it quickly gains sufficient momentum to slam the air out of most folks. Against the weight of soil, there can be no place to expand the lungs.
Even a person buried below his chest may still be grave danger. Where the soil reaches the diaphragm level, and settles in a form that has pushed the abdominal contents into the chest cavity, the effect on breathing can be the same as confining the chest.

Soil walls may collapse multiple times, or in phases, in the same trench. 60 percent of fatalities in trench rescues involve would-be rescuers. Soil collapse related deaths are both work-related and recreation-related, and all too often include children. The beach is a repeated setting of concern (from a story apparently no longer up at WebMD):


Safety Note for Beachcombers: Don't Dig Too Deep

Sand Holes Collapse, Suffocate Toddlers, Children, Even Adults

By Jeanie Davis
WebMD Medical News

Reviewed by Dr. Jacqueline Brooks

April 17, 2001 -- Sharks, skin cancer, drowning -- was a day at the beach ever a picnic? What's left, just digging holes in the sand? Maybe not. With beach season drawing nearer, two researchers report that several children -- and young adults -- have died when sand holes got a bit too deep and suddenly collapsed on them.

“There actually is the potential for catastrophe," says Bradley A. Maron, a second-year medical student at Brown University School of Medicine in Providence, R.I. The paper, which he co-authored with his father, Barry J. Maron, MD, of the Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, appears in this week's Journal of the American Medical Association.

In their paper, the Marons document seven cases of sudden- and near-death experiences involving beach holes.

The Marons' study began four years ago -- during a vacation at Martha's Vineyard -- when they witnessed a beach-hole incident that triggered their study of the phenomenon. "It was an 8-year-old girl, under the sand for seven minutes before rescuers could get to her," he tells WebMD. She survived, says the younger Maron.

He spoke with the beach rescue team afterward: "They said without question it seems to happen with greater frequency than is realized," Maron tells WebMD. He began watching CNN for similar news accounts and made follow-up phone calls for details.

Six of the seven incidents he documented since 1997 took place on public beaches -- all on the Atlantic coast -- mostly involving children, says Maron. In five cases, the holes were being dug by hand or using toy beach shovels. In two instances, people were inside holes they had found.

In each instance, Maron says, the person suddenly became completely submerged by sand when the walls of the excavation unexpectedly collapsed.

"The biggest complication in rescue efforts," Maron tells WebMD, "is that the sand appears undisturbed after the hole caves in, so rescuers don't know exactly where the person is. And they have to dig with their hands, for fear of hurting them with shovels. They just can't get to them in time." Four people among the cases were submerged for long periods of time -- 15 minutes to an hour -- and could not be resuscitated.

In one case, a 21-year-old man vacationing in North Carolina dug a nine-foot-deep hole. "He was down in the hole, just lounging in the chair when suddenly and unexpectedly it collapsed on him," says Maron. "It was catastrophic immediately. He had to be removed by bulldozer." Rescuers attempted CPR, but the man died.

Three people survived -- including one who experienced hypothermia and shock -- after lifeguards or other bystanders frantically dug an air pocket around their mouths and noses.

"Parents feel safe with their kids right by their side," Maron tells WebMD. "But they may not be attuned to what's going on. And afterward, people are so shameful of themselves. Of course it's not their fault; it's an accident, but it's absolutely preventable. It just takes common sense."

This phenomenon was news to at least one beach rescue team member, but he's not surprised.

"A lot of times you see kids digging up to waist deep, and that can be just as hazardous as head-deep," says Sean Gibson, a paramedic with New Hanover Regional Medical Center, which services the beaches in Wilmington, N.C.

"A cubic foot of sand weighs much more than you would think, and there's no way that child could get out," he tells WebMD. "And nobody would be able to hear that child either."

Adults should know better than to take the risk, says Gibson. And parents should be watching their children more closely. But if children do get into this situation, here's good news. "With toddlers and children, you should be able to get to them fairly quickly if you see it happening."

Although sand dunes don't exactly fall under the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's jurisdiction, OSHA certainly recognizes trenches of all shapes and sizes as hazards, says H. Berrien Zettler, deputy director for construction.

OSHA has investigated 24 fatalities resulting from cave-ins in the last year alone, he tells WebMD. "It's a serious issue. People don't realize that dirt, or sand for that matter, is extremely heavy. It makes it impossible for people to exercise their abdominal muscles to draw in air; essentially, they suffocate."

The sheer weight of sand causes the collapse, says Zettler. "And people don't have to be completely covered with it to suffocate. Chest deep could be enough to do it -- you just can't draw air. If you're sitting down, it takes even less -- just two or three feet of sand -- to cover your chest."

Although wet sand looks hard, it's actually extremely unstable, because nothing is holding it together, says Zettler. "There's no cohesion like you find in clay soil. You dig into it, and it's like a liquid."

Be careful out there. Keep an eye on our children.

Technorati Tags:

Friday, February 16, 2007

New Feature: My Soils Links Shared Using Google Reader

I have added a side-bar feature, sharing links to feed items that catch my interests. They appear in the order that I come across them. This is the soup from which I am most likely to post.

Like many, I have been using Bloglines to track my various news feeds and blog updates. Bloglines has served me very well and has earned its status as "the world’s most popular free online service for searching, subscribing, publishing and sharing RSS feeds, blogs and rich web content." Yet it hasn't changed much in the year+ I have used it and seems clunkier with each passing month.

Yesterday I moved all my subscriptions over to Google Reader. OPML made it so very easy.

Technorati Tags:

Thursday, January 18, 2007

The Week of Science Challenge


Evolgen has a challenge for us:

The Week of Science Challenge:
February 5 through February 11

Here are the elements:
* One week of science blogging and only science blogging.
* At least one post a day of pure science content.
* No blogging about anti-science -- no creationism, no anti-vaccination, no global warming denialists.

Bloggers who self-identify as scientists and science writers should post on:

1. Published, peer-reviewed research and their own research.
2. Their expert opinion on actual scientific debates - think review articles.
3. Descriptions of natural phenomena (e.g., why slugs dissolve when you put salt on them, or what causes sun flares; scientific knowledge that has reached the level of fact)

See Just Science for more information forthcoming on how to participate.

I accept!


Photo: Challenge Accepted
Originally uploaded by AD Sniper.

Tech Tags:

Sunday, January 14, 2007

Gold, Green Roads to OA Soil Science Research

Green Road, Point Reyes, CA

You invest your limited time in reading this and similar science themed blogs to inform yourself. You pursue links that promises to ground you in a new understanding. All too often your admirable efforts are frustrated by links to restricted fee-for-access login pages.

What purpose does it serve to so restrict knowledge that was funded in the public interest? A growing number of open access vehicles for publication and peer review indicate that restricted access is a waning model for funding and disseminating scientific knowledge. OA models are working for chemistry, physics and internal medicine. They will work well for the other sciences.

A recurring theme of advocacy on this blog is open access (OA) to soil science research articles. While I believe strongly that all soil scientists should support their professional soils organizations financially, I believe as strongly that all published soil science research should be freely accessible on the web. Those that can best capitalize on soil science are least able to afford fee-based access. The readers of this blog need OA soil science sources. I am committed to delivering these up to you in the several forms available: gold road and green road.

Advocates of OA differentiate between a "gold road" and a "green road" to success. The gold road is when journals move from restricted access to open access. Without fanfare, the SSSAJ has stepped out onto the gold road. SSSAJ articles now convert to unrestricted access after an 18 month embargo. As a member of SSSA, with a paid subscription to SSSAJ since 1976, my regard for and commitment to SSSAJ has risen to new heights on this quiet action.

SSSAJ's most recent un-embargoed articles are in Vol. 69, Iss. 4.

The green road to OA is where authors self-publish research in open access venues. Especially significant to this is self-archiving. Because it is a seamless extension of accepted pre-web-era practice, OA self-archiving does not interfere with copyright and publication by scientific journals. Because of this acceptance and the unassailable viability of OA self-archiving, resistance is futile:


Open Access (OA) means free access for all would-be users webwide to all articles published in all peer-reviewed research journals across all scholarly and scientific disciplines. 100% OA is optimal for research, researchers, their institutions, and their funders because it maximizes research access and usage. It is also 100% feasible: authors just need to deposit ("self-archive") their articles on their own institutional websites. Hence 100% OA is inevitable. Yet the few keystrokes needed to reach it have been paralyzed for a decade by a seemingly endless series of phobias (about everything from piracy and plagiarism to posterity and priorities), each easily shown to be groundless, yet persistent and recurring. The cure for this "Zeno's Paralysis" is for researchers' institutions and funders to mandate the keystrokes, just as they already mandate publishing, and for the very same reason: to maximize research usage, impact and progress. 95% of researchers have said they would comply with a self-archiving mandate; 93% of journals have already given self-archiving their blessing.

I have linked to self-archived sources in several posts. Philippe Baveye passed along his Whither Goes Soil Science..., which I archived with PB's permission on the nscss.org site. It's a revealing article, and gets linked frequently. Bestenergies.com's copy of the Nature article on Terra Preta (pdf) appears to be based on a similar self-archiving arrangement. Links to self-archived articles were provided in the post on invasive earthworms. In this last case the counter-intuitive conclusion of the research, that the need to prevent the spread of invasive earthworm calls for state legislative action, likely gave the authors critical incentive to make their work more widely accessible to lawmakers and the affected public.

My position is that if a source I here use is restricted access, I won't frustrate you by linking to it. And if I can't link to it, I won't rely on it to explain the positions I take.

I am curious if anybody else reading this blog has thoughts on OA, and especially as it relates to soil science. Your comments are strongly encouraged.




Special thanks to Peter Suber, for his Open Acess News Blog, the best place to monitor the ever strengthening pulse of OA, and the source of my exposure to Zeno's Paralysis.

Photo source: Road through the green
Originally uploaded by chartno3.


Wednesday, January 03, 2007

Black Earth

Peak Energy has a long post on Terra Preta that brings together what has been established on the subject. As of yet, there is no direct mention of the role of glomalin , just a minor mention of the mutualistic fungi that produce it. Glomalin is an unvalidated factor in Terra Preta formation that several of us sense will be demonstrated by soil research as fundamentally important.

Spurred on by back40, I am fascinated with bio-char, Terra Preta's key soil amendment. Last summer I constructed a small charcoal retort out of a cracker tin. I used it to produce small pilot batches of low temperature charcoal. Hoping to transform my simple charcoal into a reasonably bio-char-like material, I am currently composting my bits.

Image source: Nestor Kaempf

Tuesday, January 02, 2007

Two New Soil Science Blogs

David Crouse, over at North Carolina State has started a new soil science blog. It is obviously a tentative effort at this point, seeing as how the last post has nothing to do with soil science. You have to start somewhere. I am eagerly looking for more soil science blogging. NC State is one of my favorite soil science universities so, while I haven't met DC personally, I expect this blog could work up to (or inspire) something noteworthy.

I have started a second soil science related blog: NSCSS News and Views. A fair amount of material gets passed to me as NSCSS Secretary. Job opportunities, for example. I'll post items as they get to me. If I notice anything attracting and holding folks attention, I'll build on that.

See also: Where are all the soil science bloggers....

Monday, December 11, 2006

NC Science Blogging Conference Jan 20, 2007


The world needs more science bloggers.[1] There are a lot of science bloggers in NC.[2] Soil science bloggers are few.[3] There is a concentration of soil scientists in and very close to North Carolina.[4] Soil scientists should go to the 2007 Science Blogging Conference Sat, Jan 20, 2007, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Chapel Hill, NC.[5]

...

Tuesday, December 05, 2006

New Soil Science Blog at University of Western Australia


Andrew Rates (UWA) has started a blog for UWA's caffeine-dependent Soil Science Journal Club. It is a closed forum, intended for "UWA Higher Degree by Research students and UWA staff only." This is the type of idea that we could see perpetuating similar efforts at other schools and research groups.

The idea of this blog is to record the progress of a journal club, and preferably to provide an ongoing resource for people interested in recent advances in Soil Science and related disciplines.

I have in mind running a Journal Club for interested postgraduate students and staff. I would like to focus on recent significant advances and developments in Soil Science, preferably including all subdisciplines (soil biology, soil chemistry, soil physics, pedology, ...).

Articles are likely to be sourced predominantly from premier / high-impact journals such as Science, Nature, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, Earth and Planetary Science Reviews, etc. This isn't to say that we can't access the more traditional soils journals, but I'd like (at least at first) to focus on big-picture, high-impact issues.
There is a promising post here of the group's first discussion subject: Marris, E. 2006. Putting the carbon back: Black is the new green. Nature 442:624-626 . It seems to me these folks are asking the right questions.

I have added this site to my (frightfully short) list of soil science blogs.

Saturday, September 23, 2006

Come a Cropper

Gary Jones' posts over at Muck and Mystery never fail to get me thinking how the land works. Like this post where he promotes pasture over cropland. Which made me think back to an article at wikipedia about the paleopedological record that had wow-ed me recently:

Mollisols, the major agricultural soils of the present, are unique in their geological youth, being known from the Eocene but common only from the Miocene, as grasslands evolved.


"As grasslands evolved". Think about it. Can you see the Miocene era fire pushing back the forest and grass/soil biotic community evolving to extend their advantage? The evolution of grazing and grazers that followed? The soils darkening and levels of soil biologial activity ramping up?

Soils look so different in the forests versus in the grassland. Mollisols are awesome soils, and grazing is a natural component in their formation.

Friday, February 24, 2006

Carbon Coalition Against Global Warming

The Carbon Coalition Against Global Warming says that the best way to combat Global Warming is to encourage farmers to cultivate deep-rooted perennial grass species and crops that can lock vast amounts of carbon up in the soil.


A new farmers’ movement was launched this week in central western New South Wales. The Carbon Coalition was launched at the Central West Conservation Farmers Association Annual Conference in Wellington.

The Carbon Coalition aims to promote organic carbon contained in agricultural soils as a carbon sink to earn tradable credits on the greenhouse emissions market.

Farmers would then be paid up to AUS$3,000 per hectare for “sequestering” carbon in the soil. To date only forests have been recognised as tradable for carbon credits.
Maybe. I have a little heartburn over an expectation that the scientific community has promoted that leads us to believe that we can create a significant, persistent sink of carbon by using established farming and forestry approaches. The signal-to-noise ratio in applicable soil carbon sequestration data seems quite high low, especially in regards to a convincing ability to actually "lock in" the soil carbon sunk in the sink. I wouldn't feel so uncomfortable if there wasn't so much money at stake. Governments and carbon generating industries seem very eager to act with little in the way of verification. Landowners, ever strapped by a system seemingly stacked against the food and fiber producer, see a key tool for economic survival. Fundamental soil science and biology get relegated to the back seat while folks work out the international carbon credit and payment mechanisms.

At the front end, soil will naturally sequester more carbon as atmospheric carbon increases. Yet no one seems to talk about measuring performance against this moving baseline. At the back end, considering
the millenial timescale relevant to climate change, persistence is a very real issue.

As mentioned, I have a little heartbun about carbon credit mechanisms, but not a huge amount at this point. Work in the area of ammending soil with bio-char and, separately or in combination with bio-char, promoting mycorrhyzal fungi to produce glomalin seem both very promising in terms of the fundamental science. Both are fairly recent discoveries with huge implications. Hopefully we have a few more rabbits to pull out of the living soil hat.


MPOG - Microbial Prospection for Oil and Gas

Microbial Prospectation looks for anomolies in microbial populations. The presence of various groups of methane-, propane- and butane-oxidizing micro-organisms can reliably differentiate between prospective and non-prospective areas, as well as between oil and gas reservoirs. The result of many years of exerience, the success rate exceeds 90%. This stand-alone approach is inexpensive, probably benefiting from recent computational improvements in characterizing microbial genetic characteristics. Makes you wonder what other benefits will accrue from these types of advances.

Read more at Microbial Prospection and Recovery for Oil and Gas

Tip from: OilNetCom Blog

Friday, February 17, 2006

Where are all the soil science bloggers?


It's time to play a game! Where are all the soil science bloggers? Are soil scientists genetically inclined to dislike the nontechnical nature of the blogosphere? Or are we being discriminated against by our colleagues in the earth sciences?

Where are all the soil science bloggers? Here's the list.


Soil Scientists who blog

At the UWA: The Soil Science Journal Club
...a resource for people interested in recent advances in Soil Science in all its guises...

Orangepoop's Dirt Girl
Decomposition of the socio-political element. Live from Washington D.C.

Soil Artist/Jay Noller's Soil Body
It is all about our relationship to the biologically active layer of Earth - Soil
(...posting again after 10 month hiatus: worth waiting for...)


Honorable Mention

Doctor Dirt's As the Yarn Turns
Sweeny_Todd's LiveJournal
dr_dirt's LiveJournal
come-along-fool's LiveJournal


Special Mention – enthusiasts who track soil science blogs

Back40's Muck and Mystery
John Gay's Sustainable Ag Website


Attribution to greengabbro for the intro, parodied above.

[Updated: January 09, 2007]

Tech Tags:

Sunday, January 01, 2006

Happy New Year's with Writely and Zoho Writer!

Today I comparison tested two web-based beta-version word processors: Writely and Zoho Writer. Both make it deliciously easy to post to blogger. Both are free and are painless to start into. Both can import and save documents in HTML, MSOffice and OOo formats (I'm partial to OOo, which is free, and allows me to export as a pdf). Of the two, I like Zoho Writer's interface, feel, pace and task flow better, but I have to stick with Writely because of some critical features.

Both Writely and Zoho Writer allow the use of tags, which like gmail, allows you multiple labels to help organize files, in my mind a superior feature to a directory tree structure assuming you have a decent file content search function. Which neither does as of yet. (Note: It would be handy if these tags translated to technorati tags in the document.)

Writely has two critical advantages over Zoho Writer. First, Writely has an html editor, essential for inserting and finessing special bits like technorati tags, etc. Zoho Writer has some minimal html editing capabilities which you see when you right-click on selected text.

Second critical difference is that Writely I can replace my blog entry with an updated version using an "update post" option. Not so with Zoho Writer - every time I uploaded this article, it had to be a new entry, forcing me to delete the old one. Also, with Writely, you can use special character's in the title (', !, ?) and it is possible to edit the article title at the point it will be uploaded to the blog, even when you update the post. In Zoho Writer my workaround is to Save As Template, and reopen as a new document.

Indications are that ZohoWriter has got more work to get out of beta than Writely does. Cut-and-paste between documents requires going into a Mozilla file and hacking it to allow an unauthorized script. Editing styles and character fonts is a little dicey. The date-time stamp when I post to my blog is straight up UTC - not what I want.

Unlike Zoho Writer, Writely has the ability to insert bookmarks and internal links, although I haven't been able to get that feature to work so well for me yet in the blog. Neither program has the image file import interface I want. If I want to import a lofi thumbnail that links externally to a the original version (ala blogger's editor) it is going to have to be done the old fashioned way. I can't even resize the image to be inserted. Zoho Writer has an "anchor" button that may support image insertion and placement but I haven't figured it out yet. Again, an html editor would be nice.

Zoho Writer's advantage over Writely are that it is significantly faster, doesn't open the document in a separate window, and in my personal opinion, has a cleaner touch to the interface. For example, you don't close (or "done" button) a document - just save (or not and lose changes) and cleanly move on to the next task. The login procedure is faster. I find Zoho Writer more pleasant to use than Writely and thought I would like it better until I got into it deeper. I am compelled to stick with Writely for now.

Technorati tags:

Tuesday, December 20, 2005

Mollisols, Agricultural Systems and the Dangers of Static Thinking

One of my favorite blogs is Muck and Mystery, by Gary Jones, a self described bio-geek. In a December 18th post Muck and Mystery includes a map of the global distribution of Mollisols. The map demonstrates that the best agricultural soils in the world are largely in North America and the European Union. We can expect high crop production from these areas and it is self-evident why nations with productive soils can be expected to demand more fertilizer per unit area. The point Muck and Mystery counters is that patterns of crop production and fertilizer use are largely accounted for by patterns of export subsidies.

Hear, hear. Eliminating farm supports in developed countries will not eliminate long term demand for agricultural exports from the US and EU. While there are compelling elements of truth to the notion that agriculture production is a political toy, it becomes a dangerously simplistic construct when extended to justify redistributing agricultural production on a global scale. The planet has limited areas where soils and climate are ideal for crop production. Ignoring the realities of what the land can, and cannot, support is always a terrible mistake. Doing it in the name of economic justice and environmental protection doesn't make it right.

Ignoring what the land compels in the name of other good causes abounds. Whether it is in the name of endangered species protection, wetland protection, smart growth or prime farmland protection, the supply of ironic disconnects far exceeds demand. Thank you Muck and Mystery for holding our collective do-gooder feet to the fire yet again.

Update:
Here's a link to a news article shedding some light on the complex subject of export subsidies.
Column: WhereĆ¢€™s that 18 cents for African cotton producers?
Dec 29, 2005 2:56 PM
African farmers should ask their leaders why their prices are 18 cents below world cotton prices


Technorati Tag: